I am working on my first BI4 universe, and asking myself some existential questions about context creation.
Coming from the pre-BI4 UNV world, I am familiar with contexts, and IDT seems to have a much more user-friendly interface for managing them. However, I was wondering if someone with some more hands-on experience with IDT could give me some advice concerning the new "neutral" joins. Is it better to always explicitly include ALL joins that are compatible with a context, or to rely on the "neutral" designation to include them? I can see where neutral joins are quite handy for universe maintenance -- no longer have to remember to add joins manually to multiple contexts when they're added to the universe! -- but I'm not sure how to use them from a best practices perspective.
Do you only include/exclude explicitly for joins that cause a problem between two tables? For example, I have tables A and B, they can be reached through two different paths, I create two contexts to separate things. Context 1 explicitly excludes the joins in one path and explicitly includes the joins in the other; context 2 does the opposite. All other joins which are compatible with both contexts are designated "neutral". Is this the way to proceed?
